From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.5]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA7Jtvq5025500 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:55:57 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.121]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oA7JtgJZ025390 for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2010 14:55:43 -0500 Message-ID: <4CD7043D.5030306@cfl.rr.com> Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2010 14:55:41 -0500 From: Phillip Susi MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4CD35D3E.5030200@cfl.rr.com> <4CD5F804.3040906@cfl.rr.com> <4CD6252A.9040003@spinn.net> In-Reply-To: <4CD6252A.9040003@spinn.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM + raid + san Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: allane@spinn.net, LVM general discussion and development On 11/07/2010 12:03 AM, allan wrote: > Have you considered using mdadm for the RAID configuration and lvm to > carve it up? As I said in my original message, I understand that is what most people do, but multiple servers can not have mdadm mount the same disks at the same time AFAIK.