From: Jonathan Tripathy <jonnyt@abpni.co.uk>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Snapshots and disk re-use
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 07:33:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6609E4.10800@abpni.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1102232052520.18119@bmsred.bmsi.com>
On 24/02/11 02:00, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
>>>>> So I'm guessing then, that when a snapshot is created for an origin,
>>>>> then
>>>>> there are 2 physical copies of the data on disk? (Albeit only one is
>>>>> accessible at the regular filesystem level)
>>>> NO, NO, NO. There is still only *one* physical copy of the data
>>>> after creating a snapshot. You have simply created a "branch point"
>>>> which can now diverge as each branch is written to.
>>>>
>>> Then why was it suggested that I should zero my new customer LVs upon
>>> creation? Please remember that my snapshots will not be written to
>>>
>> However the origin will be written to as it will be in use...
> There were 3 cases of what you might be asking. One of the 3 cases was:
> If you are taking snapshots for backup, then it was suggested to zero the *-cow
> (which will have any blocks written to the origin since the snapshot was taken)
> before deleting the snapshot. However, I wasn't sure if this was safe to while
> the origin is mounted, since writes to the origin consult the *-cow to see
> whether origin blocks need to be copied before begin overwritten.
But I want to keep this data. As the data written to the origin while a
respective snapshot is in use would be data during normal operation of a
customer VPS.
All I want to do is make sure that my use of snapshot for backup
purposes (to rsync the snapshot to a remote server) doesn't leave loose
data lying anywhere on physical disk.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-24 7:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-23 12:36 [linux-lvm] Snapshots and disk re-use Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-23 13:09 ` Joe Thornber
2011-02-23 13:57 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-23 14:16 ` Joe Thornber
2011-02-23 14:18 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-23 16:12 ` Ray Morris
2011-02-23 16:55 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-23 17:54 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-23 18:05 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-23 19:34 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-23 18:05 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-23 18:19 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-23 18:39 ` Les Mikesell
2011-02-23 19:39 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-23 20:03 ` Les Mikesell
2011-02-23 20:37 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-23 20:49 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-23 23:25 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-23 23:42 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-24 0:09 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-24 0:32 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-24 0:37 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-24 0:40 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-24 2:00 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-24 7:33 ` Jonathan Tripathy [this message]
2011-02-24 14:50 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-24 14:57 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-24 15:13 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-24 15:20 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-24 16:41 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-24 19:15 ` Nataraj
2011-02-24 19:25 ` Les Mikesell
2011-02-24 19:55 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-24 19:19 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-24 19:45 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-24 21:22 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-05 20:09 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-05 20:41 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-04-05 20:48 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-05 20:59 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-05 21:36 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-05 22:42 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-05 22:52 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-05 23:11 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-05 23:19 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-05 23:39 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-06 0:00 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-06 0:08 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-04-06 0:14 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-06 0:16 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-06 0:28 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-06 0:38 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-04-06 0:43 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-04-06 1:36 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-06 1:47 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-06 1:53 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-06 0:47 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-06 0:42 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-06 0:50 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-06 1:20 ` James Hawtin
2011-04-06 1:45 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-02-23 19:49 ` Nataraj
2011-02-23 19:24 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-23 19:07 ` [linux-lvm] Problem executing lvm related commands Tinni
2011-02-23 19:33 ` [linux-lvm] Snapshots and disk re-use Phillip Susi
2011-02-23 19:45 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-02-23 19:56 ` Nataraj
2011-02-23 13:18 ` Sunil_Gupta2
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6609E4.10800@abpni.co.uk \
--to=jonnyt@abpni.co.uk \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).