From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.19]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p24FW7iL019664 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:32:07 -0500 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p24FVvsD014701 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2011 10:31:57 -0500 Message-ID: <4D7105EA.4030000@cfl.rr.com> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2011 10:31:54 -0500 From: Phillip Susi MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1299228115.13997.37.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1299228115.13997.37.camel@localhost> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Resizing underlying LVM partition after cloning to bigger disk Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Cc: Radu Rendec On 3/4/2011 3:41 AM, Radu Rendec wrote: > They do. But the "2TB" disk is actually 2000GB, which is safe (it takes > more than 2048GB to run into trouble with m$dos partitions). They are actually only 2 trillion bytes, or 1862 GB.