* [linux-lvm] SAN
@ 2011-04-22 16:28 Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-22 16:38 ` Stuart D. Gathman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Tripathy @ 2011-04-22 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
Hi Everyone,
I am considering my options at deploying a large SAN for our Xen cloud.
We love LVM and find that it's great for expanding and shrinking LVs.
What is the best way to deploy LVM in such a way that multiple servers
could access the LVs? Really what I'm looking for is a "common VG" for
all of our servers. Note though that only one server will actually
access each LV, however it would be cool if another server could make a
snapshot to perform an rsync backup.
Any help or advice would be appreciated
Thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] SAN
2011-04-22 16:28 [linux-lvm] SAN Jonathan Tripathy
@ 2011-04-22 16:38 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-04-22 16:42 ` Jonathan Tripathy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stuart D. Gathman @ 2011-04-22 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
> What is the best way to deploy LVM in such a way that multiple servers could
> access the LVs? Really what I'm looking for is a "common VG" for all of our
> servers. Note though that only one server will actually access each LV,
> however it would be cool if another server could make a snapshot to perform
> an rsync backup.
This is what cluster LVM is for. It provides a locking mechanism to
avoid conflicting changes to LVM metadata.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] SAN
2011-04-22 16:38 ` Stuart D. Gathman
@ 2011-04-22 16:42 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-22 17:22 ` Jonathan Tripathy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Tripathy @ 2011-04-22 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
On 22/04/2011 17:38, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
>> What is the best way to deploy LVM in such a way that multiple
>> servers could access the LVs? Really what I'm looking for is a
>> "common VG" for all of our servers. Note though that only one server
>> will actually access each LV, however it would be cool if another
>> server could make a snapshot to perform an rsync backup.
>
> This is what cluster LVM is for. It provides a locking mechanism to
> avoid conflicting changes to LVM metadata.
>
I'm a little confused on where CLVM fits into the "big picture". Let's
say I have one SAN server, and 10 Xen Servers. Where do I install CLVM?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] SAN
2011-04-22 16:42 ` Jonathan Tripathy
@ 2011-04-22 17:22 ` Jonathan Tripathy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Tripathy @ 2011-04-22 17:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
On 22/04/2011 17:42, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>
> On 22/04/2011 17:38, Stuart D. Gathman wrote:
>> On Fri, 22 Apr 2011, Jonathan Tripathy wrote:
>>
>>> What is the best way to deploy LVM in such a way that multiple
>>> servers could access the LVs? Really what I'm looking for is a
>>> "common VG" for all of our servers. Note though that only one server
>>> will actually access each LV, however it would be cool if another
>>> server could make a snapshot to perform an rsync backup.
>>
>> This is what cluster LVM is for. It provides a locking mechanism to
>> avoid conflicting changes to LVM metadata.
>>
> I'm a little confused on where CLVM fits into the "big picture". Let's
> say I have one SAN server, and 10 Xen Servers. Where do I install CLVM?
>
>
Am I correct in saying that I only need to install CLVM on my Xen nodes?
Assuming that my SAN server is just a standard iSCSI server exporting a
few targets. I would probably only have 1 LUN per vg (hense 1 PV per vg).
Is that correct?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-22 17:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-22 16:28 [linux-lvm] SAN Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-22 16:38 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2011-04-22 16:42 ` Jonathan Tripathy
2011-04-22 17:22 ` Jonathan Tripathy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).