From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.19]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p8GItW62009835 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:55:32 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com (mail-fx0-f46.google.com [209.85.161.46]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8GItVBe025398 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:55:31 -0400 Received: by fxe4 with SMTP id 4so2832976fxe.33 for ; Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:55:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4E739B9A.3040608@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2011 20:55:22 +0200 From: Klaus Lichtenwalder MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <4E6FAC6C.9010207@gmail.com> <4E723D29.1020209@lichtenwalder.name> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1863A06EB0E5293DA527A15F" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] RHEL: special ownership for lv devices? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1863A06EB0E5293DA527A15F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 16.09.2011 19:19, schrieb Stuart D. Gathman: > On Thu, 15 Sep 2011, Klaus Lichtenwalder wrote: >=20 >> I created a start script that mknods /dev/dm-X from >> /dev/mapper/vg_asm--* devices, but I consider this a kludge... >=20 > Wouldn't symlinks be safer? >=20 Stuart, sorry for me being clueless, but why do you think symlinks being safer? I keep the dm-X X number consisten with the minor number of the device. Klaus --=20 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Klaus Lichtenwalder, Dipl. Inform., http://www.lichtenwalder.name PGP Key fingerprint: BF52 72FA 1F5A 1E29 C0F8 498C C4C6 633C 2821 97DA --------------enig1863A06EB0E5293DA527A15F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOc5uaAAoJEMTGYzwoIZfavFYQAK2BAIQ0AOfaAeksXxqoqbPG P5mY3jxiT1JYggXvoKteYnGbtcez8CarQmw7UYster4WSCphDliPQgA7d9rNKHI/ A3ra5iGjr3lJm4P3kjEIWzOjzYBD5eu40nxwfdHeXgqUiRDbWrrGMu8h/JHaJWmY yOWexUTlxlBdmQGQIpqfasqATJGSCOC2fNZ7iPl3PVH2Up/Tuh2DuxgKpvD9BotG TN+tCE+4wLTpWB8i1XAu2UrH3+li3RRERNqmJfwMVAG1JoRYvQGHXVlst86D50rc jQjt4Js9k6GNMLPbTUPVcOcP2beZ0CSRRQVLJYwNJprxm4exYgx5MKnm0FPKOzV/ hzHny8dL3IXA+f6uVvEosF26dhyqFkOPieRnv07CWmaGW5eMLiQZFZNgr6a992zs KFMwv+nn3djyOxIekgjR/xNIlzm+mhesmswNqAlJJsorSOMyDy1/uELcguzH9f3m Wwgmj1vyGOnhGSiCbRDZBC1c58vPbSuqgXlEHPI/zLj2JE6+QXKC86QLTLervvoF T307OhGtJL0zitWJPJ90vKSHp+8F4K3D01YjMG55PWm5kP+Xj8NWV1/KkWe2deFB WHAQ45Fc7DIQEipuWGyuPbdKTI83W78dYVExw+bw48xzbb9sLzfMSyqiL6gPZ2VC bI6lamDD1ftUXZxAxRFL =UURW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1863A06EB0E5293DA527A15F--