From: Digimer <linux@alteeve.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: Dan White <ygor@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] N00b Question: Logical Volume without a Logical Volume Group ?
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 14:45:02 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EB03E2E.3050003@alteeve.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <604704853.1651560.1320172792894.JavaMail.root@sz0126a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net>
On 11/01/2011 02:39 PM, Dan White wrote:
> Is a logical volume group necessary before one can start making mountable partitions ?
>
> I'm trying to work with a SAN. We were allocated a 10Gb LUN to "play" with. Another admin created a logical volume on the LUN and then made a single partition out of the logical volume. The flow I am familiar with from Red Hat's GUI is to first make a logical volume group, then make partitions in the group that I can adjust in size as necessary.
>
> Are both workflows valid ?
LVs must be created from VGs.
--
Digimer
E-Mail: digimer@alteeve.com
Freenode handle: digimer
Papers and Projects: http://alteeve.com
Node Assassin: http://nodeassassin.org
"omg my singularity battery is dead again.
stupid hawking radiation." - epitron
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-01 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-01 18:39 [linux-lvm] N00b Question: Logical Volume without a Logical Volume Group ? Dan White
2011-11-01 18:45 ` Digimer [this message]
2011-11-01 19:13 ` Dan White
2011-11-01 19:20 ` Digimer
2011-11-01 19:51 ` Dan White
2011-11-02 14:02 ` Mark H. Wood
2011-11-01 21:09 ` Ray Morris
2011-11-02 10:18 ` James Hawtin
2011-11-02 11:41 ` Marek Podmaka
2011-11-02 13:37 ` James Hawtin
2011-11-02 14:18 ` Mark H. Wood
2011-11-02 14:50 ` Marek Podmaka
2011-11-02 14:56 ` James Hawtin
2011-11-02 15:06 ` Dan White
2011-11-02 16:39 ` James Hawtin
2011-11-02 17:30 ` Eugene Vilensky
2011-11-02 18:23 ` Dan White
2011-11-02 18:41 ` Dan White
2011-11-02 17:57 ` Galen Seitz
2011-11-03 6:53 ` Marek Podmaka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4EB03E2E.3050003@alteeve.com \
--to=linux@alteeve.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=ygor@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox