linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM commands extremely slow during raid check/resync
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:31:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4F71CF55.4020706@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120326155540.19c85fe9@bettercgi.com>

Dne 26.3.2012 22:55, Ray Morris napsal(a):
> Put -vvvv on the command and see what takes so long. In our case, 
> it was checking all of the devices to see if they were PVs.
> "All devices" includes LVs, so it was checking LVs to see if they
> were PVs, and activating an LV triggered a scan in case it was 
> a PV, so activating a volume group was especially slow (hours).
> The solution was to use "filter" in lvm.conf like this:
> 
> filter = [ "r|^/dev/dm.*|", "r|^/dev/vg-.*|","a|^/dev/sd*|", "a|^/dev/md*|", "r|.*|" ]
> 
> That checks only /dev/sd* and /dev/md*, to see if they are PVs, 
> skipping the checks of LVs to see if they are also PVs. Since the
> device list is cached, use vgscan -vvvv to check that it's checking 
> the right things and maybe delete that cache first. My rule IS 
> a bit redundant because I had trouble getting the simpler form 
> to do what I wanted. I ended up using a belt and suspenders 
> approach, specifying both "do not scan my LVs" and "scan only
> /dev/sd*".

Could you check upstream  CVS version of lvm2 with 2 extra patches:
(not yet upstream)

https://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2012-March/msg00171.html
https://www.redhat.com/archives/lvm-devel/2012-March/msg00172.html

Whether your slow PV operations are solved ?

Zdenek

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-27 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-25  7:56 [linux-lvm] LVM commands extremely slow during raid check/resync Larkin Lowrey
2012-03-26 13:02 ` James Candelaria
2012-03-26 17:49   ` Larkin Lowrey
2012-03-26 20:55 ` Ray Morris
2012-03-26 23:51   ` Larkin Lowrey
2012-03-27 14:34     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-03-27 21:24       ` Larkin Lowrey
2012-03-28  7:53         ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-03-28 18:26           ` Stuart D Gathman
2012-03-29  0:27             ` Ray Morris
2012-03-29  9:48             ` Zdenek Kabelac
2012-03-27 14:31   ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2012-03-27 18:11     ` Ray Morris
2012-03-27 20:36       ` Zdenek Kabelac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4F71CF55.4020706@redhat.com \
    --to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).