From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx11.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.16]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4JKUjx9026015 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:30:45 -0400 Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net [68.230.241.214]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4JKUjrg031660 for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:30:45 -0400 Received: from eastrmimpo109.cox.net ([68.230.241.222]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120519203044.HXUL26743.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo109.cox.net> for ; Sat, 19 May 2012 16:30:44 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB8031A.90503@cox.net> Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 15:31:22 -0500 From: Ron Johnson MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1816793.YNuiVBaGhv@laptop> <20120519191004.GN29330@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120519191004.GN29330@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Is the new RAID implementation going to deprecate traditional stripes and mirrors? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com On 05/19/2012 02:10 PM, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 11:58:54AM -0700, ben wrote: >> Does all the new RAID MD support mean the standard LVM type of mirrors and >> stripes will go away or at least not be further developed? > > Current thinking: > > Stripes remain as-is (they're very simple, it's not worth changing). > > Preferred mirror switches to md, but existing mirror implementation > remains available and continues to be used for temporary mirrors like > pvmove. > IOW, md is "best practice" for mirroring? -- "There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental disaster, you need people with high IQs." Thomas Sowell