From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <4FBA048D.1030202@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 10:02:05 +0100 From: "Bryn M. Reeves" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20120517181350.2922a70b@bettercgi.com> <4FB623AC.9060900@redhat.com> <20120519231404.GF3867@bitfolk.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvreduce nightmare Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Cc: tariq wali -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 05/20/2012 09:59 AM, tariq wali wrote: > Hi Andy, > > Thanks for the mail. > > I am not sure if reducing by lvreduce alone is safe and will > actually reduce the underneath file system also, look at this > sequence .. It will if you specify -r/--resizefs. This will call the fsadm script appropriately to perform the same resize on the file system itself (either before or after, depending on whether you are shrinking or growing). Regards, Bryn. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk+6BI0ACgkQ6YSQoMYUY96QoACbBY/kXAMhYx4el1LKi5/0pI6S xrAAoJhIktgoSrxVfoPBMrtS0Ki5MhB+ =yRht -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----