From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.19]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7O6WtMg027457 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:32:55 -0400 Received: from mail1.gosport.uk.corp.abpni.net (edge1.gosport.uk.abpni.net [109.200.19.114]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7O6WqSJ029353 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:32:52 -0400 Received: from localhost (mail1.gosport.corp.uk.abpni.net [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.gosport.uk.corp.abpni.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51D75A0006 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:32:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail1.gosport.uk.corp.abpni.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.mail.gosport.corp.uk.abpni.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7BDwcstdRto4 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:32:27 +0100 (BST) Received: from Jonathans-MacBook-Air.local (unknown [10.87.0.109]) by mail1.gosport.uk.corp.abpni.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2213C5A0005 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:32:27 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <50372014.3000306@abpni.co.uk> Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 07:32:52 +0100 From: Jonathan Tripathy MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <39598.78.154.109.125.1345731038.squirrel@yellowside.org.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070903060404050904060101" Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvextend NEVER works but screws up Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070903060404050904060101 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 23/08/2012 16:18, tariq wali wrote: > lvresize to extend an lvm ? how It's the same syntax as lvextend. > > also I cant create a new lvm don't have that much space and the to > extend the new one and it would mean downtime . don't think it's an > issue with filesystem tools , lvm has NEVER been consistent in my case . Can you please provide details on why you don't think it's a filesystem issue? Have you come across other details that lead you to believe this? These details may help the list in helping you. While I may be over simplifying things, all LVM is, is a fancy block mapper. Most complicated things are done by the filesystem on top. --------------070903060404050904060101 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 23/08/2012 16:18, tariq wali wrote:
 lvresize to extend an lvm ? how
It's the same syntax as lvextend.

also I cant create a new lvm don't have that much space and the to extend the new one and it would mean downtime . don't think it's an issue with filesystem tools , lvm has NEVER been consistent in my case .
Can you please provide details on why you don't think it's a filesystem issue? Have you come across other details that lead you to believe this? These details may help the list in helping you. While I may be over simplifying things, all LVM is, is a fancy block mapper. Most complicated things are done by the filesystem on top.
--------------070903060404050904060101--