From: Mark Woodward <markw@mohawksoft.com>
To: "Bryn M. Reeves" <bmr@redhat.com>
Cc: Linda Walsh <lvm@tlinx.org>,
LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] access or interface to list of blocks that have, changed via C.O.W.?
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 07:21:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <506EC2AC.8090505@mohawksoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <506EA7C8.409@redhat.com>
On 10/05/2012 05:26 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
> On 10/04/2012 04:02 PM, Mark Woodward wrote:
>> On 10/04/2012 10:44 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
>>> Really? I'd be surprised if it even builds against modern kernels or
>>> device-mapper.
>> Well.....
>> The LVM2 code that ships with most distros still uses the old interfaces
>> and still (Ubuntu 12.04) seemst to create a COW file with SnAp
> Yes; that's the traditional dm-snapshot target that has been in the
> kernel for years. The Zumastor/ddsnap stuff was a separate project to
> replace that using a new metadata format and target - they are not the
> same and the Zumastor snapshot code was never merged in the kernel.
So, after this discussion, I went to my Ubuntu 12.04 system (3.2.0) and
tried some of my LVM2 utilities, and they read the header but found no
changes in a snapshot when clearly there had been some.
It seems I am wrong, but I'm a little confused, did the developers
change the format of the snapshot data COW file without changing the
file header signature? If so, that is very bad thing to do. If the COW
format has changed and the device header signature has not, how does one
correctly determine how the data is stored?
>
>>> Snapshots using the thinp target use the metadata format described in
>>> dm-thin-metadata.c.
>> Where are these files to be found?
> In drivers/md in the kernel sources - the dm-thin stuff was merged after
> 3.1 (October last year); see commits starting with 991d9fa.
>
> Regards,
> Bryn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-05 11:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <mailman.18903.1349274978.3548.linux-lvm@redhat.com>
2012-10-03 15:42 ` [linux-lvm] access or interface to list of blocks that have, changed via C.O.W.? Mark Woodward
2012-10-04 2:52 ` Linda Walsh
2012-10-04 3:41 ` Mark Woodward
2012-10-04 5:05 ` Linda Walsh
2012-10-04 10:17 ` Mark Woodward
2012-10-04 14:44 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2012-10-04 15:02 ` Mark Woodward
2012-10-04 22:00 ` Stuart D Gathman
2012-10-05 9:39 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2012-10-05 9:26 ` Bryn M. Reeves
2012-10-05 11:21 ` Mark Woodward [this message]
2012-10-16 12:15 ` Mark Woodward
2012-10-17 10:20 ` Lars Ellenberg
2012-09-28 2:51 [linux-lvm] access or interface to list of blocks that have " Linda Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=506EC2AC.8090505@mohawksoft.com \
--to=markw@mohawksoft.com \
--cc=bmr@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
--cc=lvm@tlinx.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).