From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 In-Reply-To: <1122582390.9888.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1119267914.21477.3.camel@dilbert> <1122572640.9888.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4abcc002bdbba2935bc93443c3beec65@redhat.com> <1122582390.9888.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Message-Id: <517d02700b97c3eb5b81085969ec0e28@redhat.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jonathan E Brassow Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Progress on LVM2 snapshots Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:45:57 -0500 Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: mingz@ele.uri.edu Cc: LVM general discussion and development On Jul 28, 2005, at 3:26 PM, Ming Zhang wrote: > Thanks a lot for this information. np > Is there anything external people like us can do to speed up this? 1) File detailed bug reports 2) complain on this list 3) submit patches > There > are many people waiting for this snapshot feature since it is so useful > and essential. frankly, i know there are plan to replace md with dm, > but > since md is already stable and this snapshot is very unstable, why not > do this first? :P The squeaky wheel gets the grease. Right now, multipath, [cluster] mirroring have been getting all the attention at the expense of single machine snap-shot. Hopefully, we can get snapshots soon. brassow