linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Anton Mitterer <calestyo@scientia.net>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm RAID and segtypes... difference to MD?
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:30:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E84268.6030000@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374167576.23440.3.camel@heisenberg.scientia.net>

Dne 18.7.2013 19:12, Christoph Anton Mitterer napsal(a):
> Hi.
>
> I just stumbled across that LVM nowadays also supports higher RAID
> levels?
>
> Is this "just" reusing the MD code... or is it a new implementation?

reuse


>
> Does using it provide any advantages (i.e. performance) other than using
> the same userland tools... and perhaps greater flexibility in where the
> PEs for a RAID come from (which may be pretty arbitrary with LVM, and is
> always some devices for MD)... not that I'd say that such "flexibility"
> is really useful.

yep stacking of LVs
However some other features available in mdadm are missing in lvm
(i.e. array reshape)


> Is there any larger documentation available on what happens with the
> RAID levels and the other segtypes? I couldn't find basically
> anything... I mean things like mirror/striped are probably clear... but
> free, error, etc.?


https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/raid_volumes.html


Zdenek

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-18 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-18 17:12 [linux-lvm] lvm RAID and segtypes... difference to MD? Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-18 19:30 ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2013-07-18 21:36   ` Christoph Anton Mitterer
2013-07-19  9:35     ` Zdenek Kabelac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51E84268.6030000@redhat.com \
    --to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    --cc=calestyo@scientia.net \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).