From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <51E90856.7040308@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:35:18 +0200 From: Zdenek Kabelac MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1374167576.23440.3.camel@heisenberg.scientia.net> <51E84268.6030000@redhat.com> <1374183419.5281.9.camel@fermat.scientia.net> In-Reply-To: <1374183419.5281.9.camel@fermat.scientia.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm RAID and segtypes... difference to MD? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Cc: Christoph Anton Mitterer Dne 18.7.2013 23:36, Christoph Anton Mitterer napsal(a): > Hi. > > Thanks for the answers... > > > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 21:30 +0200, Zdenek Kabelac wrote: >> https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/raid_volumes.html > But that's only about the RAIDs... not about the other segtypes :( How about going to: https://access.redhat.com/site/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Logical_Volume_Manager_Administration/ > And even there it doesn't provide that much detail information... like > how much it reuses from MD (same superblocks?) and e.g. whether one can > use such devices also with mdadm (respectively vice versa. I guess it's obvious it's using different metadata format - since it's based on PV/VG/LV. Internally dmraid shares same kernel code with mdraid. (unlike mirror which is internal to dm) There is no detailed doc about everything :) - you can read the open-source. Zdenek