From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.19]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7O8gfcm004345 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:42:41 -0400 Received: from mail.fibbs.org (phineas.fibbs.org [109.234.106.32]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7O8gd9i021559 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:42:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fibbs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D2D2003F2 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:42:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.fibbs.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.fibbs.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10025) with ESMTP id pzLbBToaKsXa for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:42:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.7.142] (46.128.33.1.dynamic.cablesurf.de [46.128.33.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.fibbs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D83042003F0 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:42:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <521871FD.8000700@mglug.de> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:42:37 +0200 From: Oliver Rath MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [linux-lvm] howto speed-up thinpool-devices? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: LVM general discussion and development Hi list, Im using thinpool-devices (and snapshots, too). I know, thinpool-devices arent the fastest one, but maybe there could make more use of read (and maybe write) caching. In my test-system are 32GB of ram, but there is a max use of cache about <1GB, not more, by heavily use of these devices. Is it possible to speed up the reading with growing up the cache use? The /sys/block/dm-X/.. directories have lots of parameters, but Im not experienced for that. Maybe Im looking@the wrong place and modifying kernel parameters (scheduler etc.) are the better way? Tfh! Oliver