linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@redhat.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Cc: list@eworm.de, zkabelac@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] blkid_wiping breaks snapshots
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:12:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <52F8DE52.1080805@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140210144821.65cf1a19@leda.localdomain>

On 02/10/2014 02:48 PM, Christian Hesse wrote:
> Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com> on Mon, 2014/02/10 13:20:
>> Dne 10.2.2014 10:30, Christian Hesse napsal(a):
>>> Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com> on Mon, 2014/02/10 09:33:
>>>> Dne 8.2.2014 00:55, Christian Hesse napsal(a):
>>>>> Christian Hesse <list@eworm.de> on Sat, 2014/02/08 00:36:
>>>>>> Hello everybody,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I nailed it down with git bisect. My first bad commit is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 75628f341ad38b68aae33eae0b5700be2a6e5769
>>>>>> configure: enable blkid_wiping by default if the blkid library is
>>>>>> present
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looks like this wipes data that is still needed... Building a package
>>>>>> with '--disable-blkid_wipe' now to verify on another system.
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh, this only helps part of...
>>>>>
>>>>> I changed my test setup and used writable snapshots. After that I got:
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: DM_snapshot_cow signature detected on /dev/cvg/snap-home at
>>>>> offset 0. Wipe it? [y/n]
>>>>>
>>>>> (see https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=176504 for another
>>>>> report)
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks like disabling blkid_wiping fixes this. My snapshot corruption
>>>>> still occurs though. :-/
>>>>> Bad thing about it is that the corruption does not occur reliable when
>>>>> doing simple tests in 'git bisect'... Out of ideas for now - Will go to
>>>>> bed now.
>>>>
>>>> Now this was helpful, I guess I think what is going on.
>>>
>>> Great! Waiting for patches then. :D
>>>
>>> I could provide some more information when needed:
>>>
>>> * This happens with read only snapshots only.
>>> * I could reproduce with commit eaa23d32732c9bc3dd4f948781b5764cf21d84ba
>>>    (wiping: add support for blkid wiping), so it was introduced there or
>>>    before.
>>>
>>> Should I investigate further or wait for something to test from you?
>>
>> Is the patch bellow fixing your problem ?
>> (It's still not final - but should help)
>>
>> Zdenek
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/lvcreate.c b/tools/lvcreate.c
>> index 638a868..e8b1a7f 100644
>> --- a/tools/lvcreate.c
>> +++ b/tools/lvcreate.c
>> @@ -772,7 +772,7 @@ static int _read_activation_params(struct
>> lvcreate_params *lp, LVM_READ | LVM_WRITE);
>>
>>          /* Must not zero/wipe read only volume */
>> -       if (!(lp->permission & LVM_WRITE)) {
>> +       if (!lp->snapshot && !(lp->permission & LVM_WRITE)) {
>>                  lp->zero = 0;
>>                  lp->wipe_signatures = 0;
>>          }
> 
> This looks good to me. I've made some backups now without any corruption.
> 
> But with blkid_wiping enabled I do have this warning/question now for read
> only snapshots as well:
> 
> WARNING: DM_snapshot_cow signature detected on /dev/cvg/snap-home
> at offset 0. Wipe it? [y/n]
> 
> lvm works perfectly only with your patch applied and compiled with
> --disable-blkid_wiping.

Also, try this patch in addition:

https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/lvm2.git/commit/?id=ed166a3b1d3290ad887d8f83c24a8d8877713d3c

-- 
Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-10 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-23 13:27 [linux-lvm] lvm2 2.02.105 breaks snapshots Christian Hesse
2014-02-04  8:55 ` Christian Hesse
2014-02-04 16:47   ` Zdenek Kabelac
2014-02-06 14:48     ` Christian Hesse
2014-02-07 13:14     ` Christian Hesse
2014-02-07 23:36       ` [linux-lvm] blkid_wiping breaks snapshots (was: lvm2 2.02.105 breaks snapshots) Christian Hesse
2014-02-07 23:55         ` Christian Hesse
2014-02-10  8:33           ` [linux-lvm] blkid_wiping breaks snapshots Zdenek Kabelac
2014-02-10  9:30             ` Christian Hesse
2014-02-10 12:20               ` Zdenek Kabelac
2014-02-10 13:48                 ` Christian Hesse
2014-02-10 14:12                   ` Peter Rajnoha [this message]
2014-02-10 14:37                     ` Christian Hesse
2014-02-10 15:56                       ` Zdenek Kabelac
2014-02-10 18:15                         ` Peter Rajnoha
2014-02-10 19:50                           ` Zdenek Kabelac
2014-02-18  8:15                   ` Christian Hesse
2014-02-18  8:27                     ` Zdenek Kabelac

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=52F8DE52.1080805@redhat.com \
    --to=prajnoha@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    --cc=list@eworm.de \
    --cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).