From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [10.34.131.16] (dhcp131-16.brq.redhat.com [10.34.131.16]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t198s7qT014294 for ; Mon, 9 Feb 2015 03:54:08 -0500 Message-ID: <54D875AF.8010705@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 09:54:07 +0100 From: Zdenek Kabelac MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <646AF90A-464B-44EC-BE14-FCD4F888A3CB@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <646AF90A-464B-44EC-BE14-FCD4F888A3CB@gmail.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM disk power management Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Dne 8.2.2015 v 19:59 Drew... napsal(a): > Hi, > I have 3 physical disks forming one volume group, with one logical volume. > If i try to issue a standby command to the logical volume i get the following > error.. > > |sudo hdparm -y /dev/mapper/VG0-LVstorage > > /dev/mapper/VG0-LVstorage: > > issuing standby command > > HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(standby) failed: Inappropriate ioctl for device| > > > But if i issue a standby command to the individual disks in the volume group.. > > |sudo hdparm -y /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1 > > /dev/sda1: > > issuing standby command > > /dev/sdb1: > > issuing standby command > > /dev/sdc1: > > issuing standby command| > > This works fine! > Is addressing individual disks the normal way to to spin down disks in a lvm > volume group or will this cause file corruption. > And if not, is there a safe way to achieve this or is it just not possible to > spin down disks in a lvm. > I would be grateful of any advice you could offer. I have spent some time > searching around for some information on this & i can not find any documented > on this anywhere. > Thanks, Yes - you need to 'hdparm' control 'real' devices/PVs. There is no point to try to control logical volumes. Imagine you could have 1000LVs on a single PV. Regards Zdenek