From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from [10.34.131.78] (dhcp131-78.brq.redhat.com [10.34.131.78])
	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP
	id u11EJMSf008204
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2016 09:19:22 -0500
References: <CAAYit8TQRuUZjjRgMUsaQWNmTGmG824KEZZ8vyNDTG=OiDbObQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <56AF696A.30503@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 15:19:22 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAAYit8TQRuUZjjRgMUsaQWNmTGmG824KEZZ8vyNDTG=OiDbObQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM generates wrong low_water_mark value in
	thin-pool's table
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>

Dne 1.2.2016 v 10:17 M.H. Tsai napsal(a):
> Hi,
>
> I found that the <low_water_mark> parameter of thin-pool's table might be
> wrong. In kernel, the this parameter is the number of free blocks. However,
> LVM commit 99237f0908d87592815f4bdf3c239e8a108e835c sets this value as the
> number of USED blocks, according
> to activation_thin_pool_autoextend_threshold_CFG. Is that a bug?

Ok - looks like my fault when translating lvm2 threshold usage to thin-pool 
target threshold usage.

Thanks for noticing

Zdenek