linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Why LVM metadata locations are not properly aligned
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 15:22:26 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5718D412.2020303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5718A369.4060103@redhat.com>

On 21.4.2016 11:54, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> On 21.4.2016 06:08, Ming-Hung Tsai wrote:
>> Hi,
>>

>>
>> 1. The metadata locations (raw_locn::offset) are not properly aligned.
>>     Function _aligned_io() requires the IO to be logical-block aligned,
>>     but metadata locations returned by next_rlocn_offset() are 512-byte
>> aligned.
>>     If a device's logical block size is greater than 512b, then LVM need to use
>>     bounce buffer to do the IO.
>>     How about setting raw_locn::offset to logical-block boundary?
>>     (or max(logical_block_size, physical_block_size) for 512-byte logical-/4KB
>>      physical-block drives?)
>
> This looks like a bug - lvm2 should start to write metadata always on physical
> block aligned position.

Hi

I've opened RFE BZ for this one - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1329234
It's not completely trivial to fix this in a backward compatible way - but I'm 
mostly 100% sure it's not cause your 10s delay unless.

Regards

Zdenek

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 13:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21  4:08 [linux-lvm] Why LVM metadata locations are not properly aligned Ming-Hung Tsai
2016-04-21  9:54 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-04-21 13:22   ` Zdenek Kabelac [this message]
2016-04-22  8:43   ` Ming-Hung Tsai
2016-04-22  9:49     ` Zdenek Kabelac
2016-04-21 10:11 ` Alasdair G Kergon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5718D412.2020303@redhat.com \
    --to=zkabelac@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).