From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [10.40.200.46] (ovpn-200-46.brq.redhat.com [10.40.200.46]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u4GE9OCk027536 for ; Mon, 16 May 2016 10:09:25 -0400 References: <4bcd585d099ecec086b99cfa5c23cc38@assyoma.it> <5739B848.3060505@redhat.com> <119b520d472b019ced48357eff9fb389@dds.nl> From: Zdenek Kabelac Message-ID: <5739D494.2040103@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 16:09:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <119b520d472b019ced48357eff9fb389@dds.nl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Unexptected filesytem unmount with thin provision and autoextend disabled - lvmetad crashed? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development On 16.5.2016 15:01, Xen wrote: > Zdenek Kabelac schreef op 16-05-2016 14:08: > >> Hi >> >> Well yeah - ATM we rather take 'early' action and try to stop any user >> on overfill thin-pool. > > May I inquire into whether this is only available in newer versions atm? > > These are my versions (lvs --version): > > LVM version: 2.02.133(2) (2015-10-30) > Library version: 1.02.110 (2015-10-30) > Driver version: 4.34.0 > > I have noticed that on my current system the entire system will basically > freeze on overfill. > > I wonder if I should take measures to upgrade to something newer if I want to > prevent this. Behavior should be there for quite a while, but relatively recent fixes in dmeventd has made it working more reliable in more circumstances. I'd recommend to play at least with 142 - but since recent releases are bugfix oriented - if you are compiling yourself - just take latest. Regards Zdenek