From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx12.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com
	[10.5.110.17])
	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP
	id p29EGSPP021603
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:16:28 -0500
Received: from m13-71.163.com (m13-71.163.com [220.181.13.71])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p29EGEeJ014316
	for <linux-lvm@redhat.com>; Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:16:16 -0500
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 22:16:40 +0800 (CST)
From: yue <ooolinux@163.com>
Message-ID: <69bd169e.1360a.12e9afa0593.Coremail.ooolinux@163.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_211660_1464625037.1299680200082"
Subject: [linux-lvm] which is better gfs2 and ocfs2?
Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Id: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/options/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/linux-lvm>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@redhat.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
To: linux-lvm <linux-lvm@redhat.com>

------=_Part_211660_1464625037.1299680200082
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

i want to use fc-san,share storage.
but  i do not know which is better?  can be used in product?
 
thanks
------=_Part_211660_1464625037.1299680200082
Content-Type: text/html; charset=GBK
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<DIV>i want to use fc-san,share storage.</DIV>
<DIV>but&nbsp; i do not know which is better?&nbsp; can be used in product?</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>thanks</DIV><br><br><span title="neteasefooter"><span id="netease_mail_footer"></span></span>
------=_Part_211660_1464625037.1299680200082--