Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Lembark <lembark@wrkhors.com>
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 19:10:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <70680000.992218203@dizzy> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010611120459.A26558@mail.wave.co.nz>

>> > Another thing to consider if you run 2.4 kernel -- mount tmpfs on /tmp
>> > (and give some reasonable size restrictions).   This way, /tmp works
>> > much faster, does not need to be cleaned on boot, and will not eat
>> > root's space.  You should have reasonable swap space it you plan to
>> > use it heavily.  Works very well here.
>>
>> tmpfs? I thought that existed only on Solaris, and the primary reason for
>> tmpfs is that Solaris's UFS is so ssllooww compared to other FS (e.g.
>> ext2, reiser, etc.)
>
> It's in Linux 2.4 also.  It has the same unfortunate problem as on
> Solaris, that once someone fills /tmp, you run out swap and daemons start
> dying.

Main reason for it on Solaris is systems w/ Large core (4GB+) who  (a) never
ever swap or noticably trim proc's and (b) got annoyed at wasiting 10+GB on
Sun's 2xcore rule for swapspace.  If you have  a4GB system w/ 8GB of 
[unused]
swap the odds of filling up /tmp are rather small.  If you have a 128MB 
system
with 10-20MB of swap in use it's a whole lot more likely.

 As always:  YMMV :-)

  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-11  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-04  8:07 [linux-lvm] LILO configuration for LVM "boot" filesystem Brian J. Murrell
2001-06-04 14:21 ` Ben Lutgens
2001-06-05  2:01   ` Brian J. Murrell
2001-06-05 11:56     ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-05 15:48       ` Jack McKinney
2001-06-05 18:32         ` Andreas Dilger
2001-06-06  4:07         ` Brian J. Murrell
2001-06-07 15:30           ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-07 15:43             ` Jack McKinney
2001-06-07 21:18               ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-07 21:36                 ` Steve Wray
2001-06-07 21:37                   ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-07 21:52                     ` Steve Wray
2001-06-07 22:15                       ` Jack McKinney
2001-06-07 22:24                         ` Steve Wray
2001-06-07 22:27                           ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-07 22:23                       ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-08  2:28                         ` Russell Coker
2001-06-08  2:26                       ` Russell Coker
     [not found]               ` <20010607182636.H3232@jensbenecke.de>
2001-06-07 16:32                 ` Jack McKinney
     [not found]                   ` <20010607191649.R3232@jensbenecke.de>
2001-06-07 19:18                     ` Jack McKinney
2001-06-07 16:39                 ` Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
2001-06-07 21:20                 ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-08  2:27                 ` Russell Coker
2001-06-07 22:29               ` Mark van Walraven
2001-06-07 22:38                 ` Steve Wray
2001-06-07 21:08             ` Michael Tokarev
     [not found]               ` <20010608153036.G21909@jensbenecke.de>
2001-06-11  0:04                 ` Mark van Walraven
2001-06-11  0:10                   ` Steven Lembark [this message]
2001-06-11  0:20                   ` Michael Tokarev
2001-06-11 11:39                     ` Russell Coker
2001-06-07 15:26         ` Steven Lembark
2001-06-05 18:00       ` Andreas Dilger
2001-06-04 17:56 ` Andreas Dilger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=70680000.992218203@dizzy \
    --to=lembark@wrkhors.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox