From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx11.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.16]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1M2EYb2017404 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:14:34 -0500 Received: from m13-48.163.com (m13-48.163.com [220.181.13.48]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1M2EMrM015235 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2011 21:14:23 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 10:14:22 +0800 (CST) From: yue Message-ID: <76375aaa.11985.12e4b2559a6.Coremail.ooolinux@163.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_195983_1062211125.1298340862373" Subject: [linux-lvm] hi,anyone would like to tell me if clvm is stable? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm ------=_Part_195983_1062211125.1298340862373 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit i have to deploy clvm, redhat tell me you can make gfs2 on clvm? i do not know what its performance? thanks ------=_Part_195983_1062211125.1298340862373 Content-Type: text/html; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
i have to deploy clvm, redhat tell me  you can make gfs2 on clvm?
i do not know what its performance?
thanks


------=_Part_195983_1062211125.1298340862373--