From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]) by int-mx14.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u44IGjQJ003546 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 14:16:45 -0400 Received: from smtp1.dds.nl (smtpgw.dds.nl [91.142.252.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 540AD7F6B1 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 18:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dds.nl (app1.dds.nl [81.21.136.61]) by smtp1.dds.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6FA7FB88 for ; Wed, 4 May 2016 20:16:41 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 20:16:41 +0200 From: Xen In-Reply-To: References: <1870050920.5354287.1462276845385.JavaMail.yahoo.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1870050920.5354287.1462276845385.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <76583bfb7d703f20a00414e16bccdf7e@dds.nl> Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] thin handling of available space Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: LVM general discussion and development Mark Mielke schreef op 04-05-2016 3:25: > Thanks for entertaining this discussion, Matthew and Zdenek. I realize > this is an open source project, with passionate and smart people, > whose time is precious. I don't feel I have the capability of really > contributing code changes at this time, and I'm satisfied that the > ideas are being considered even if they ultimately don't get adopted. > Even the mandatory warning about snapshots exceeding the volume group > size is something I can continue to deal with using scripting and > filtering. I mostly want to make sure that my perspective is known and > understood. You know, you really don't need to be this apologetic even if I mess up my own replies ;-). I think you have a right and a reason to say what you've said, and that's it.