From: Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@gmail.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] disk capacity discrepancy: is it 1000 versus 1024?
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 17:41:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87f94c3705051414416006a748@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87f94c370505141427e9e1340@mail.gmail.com>
On 5/14/05, Greg Freemyer wrote:
> On 5/14/05, Maurice Volaski wrote:
> > I originally had a hardware RAID with fourteen 400 GB drives of
> > usable capacity (Hitachi 7K400) . That's 5600 GB altogether. That's
> > what both fdisk and df report (filesystem was ext3).
> >
> > When I instead created an LVM2 physical volume on the device, I get
> > just 5.09 TB.
> >
> > Is LVM eating several hundreds gigabytes of space or is it the case
> > that LVM uses terminology in a strict multiply by 1024 fashion versus
> > everything else, which is multiplying by 1000. In that case, I guess
> > the drives aren't really 400 GBs. :-(
> >
> > However, it appears that parameters passed to LVM commands are
> > interpreted using x1000, not x1024.
> >
> > other keywords: gigabinarybytes, gibibytes, Gi, terabinarybytes, tebibytes, Ti.
> > --
> >
> > Maurice Volaski, mvolaski@aecom.yu.edu
> > Computing Support, Rose F. Kennedy Center
> > Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University
>
> As Maurice implies NIST is making an effort (however small) to
> standardize GB as 1000 * 1000 * 1000 bytes.
>
> See http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
>
> So per NIST:
> GB = Gigabyte = 1,000 * 1,000 * 1,000 Bytes
> GiB = Gibibyte = 1,024 * 1,024 * 1,024 Bytes
>
> Or for Maurice TB vs. TiB
>
> BTW, the difference between TB and TiB is almost 10% so this has a
> very user observable effect and would explain Maurice's discrepancy.
>
> So if I understand Maurice's question, it becomes:
> "Is LVM reporting TiB units with a TB designation?"
>
> Greg
> --
> Greg Freemyer
> The Norcross Group
> Forensics for the 21st Century
>
Maurice,
I forgot to add that disk drive manufactures have been selling disks
by the GB for years, not the GiB. Thus your 400 GB disk drive is most
likely about 373 GiB. (I used a calculator).
One way to tell for sure is to get the number of sectors and multiply
it out. Sectors are typically 512 bytes. You can typically see the
sector count or the paper label of newer drives, or with standard ide
disks in /proc/ide/hdx/capacity.
Greg
--
Greg Freemyer
The Norcross Group
Forensics for the 21st Century
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-14 21:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <a06210281beac17a8abb2@129.98.90.227>
2005-05-14 21:27 ` [linux-lvm] disk capacity discrepancy: is it 1000 versus 1024? Greg Freemyer
2005-05-14 21:41 ` Greg Freemyer [this message]
2005-05-17 6:21 ` Christian Hack
2005-05-14 21:18 Maurice Volaski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87f94c3705051414416006a748@mail.gmail.com \
--to=greg.freemyer@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).