From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx07.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oATH0vgu011460 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:00:58 -0500 Received: from mail-ey0-f174.google.com (mail-ey0-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oATH0lt0020458 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:00:48 -0500 Received: by eye27 with SMTP id 27so2049606eye.33 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 09:00:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20101129162756.GN16420@barkeeper1-xen.linbit> References: <20101129162756.GN16420@barkeeper1-xen.linbit> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 00:00:46 +0700 Message-ID: From: hansbkk@gmail.com Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Q: LVM over RAID, or plain disks? A:"Yes" = best of both worlds? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > Did you consider DRBD? > I mentioned that as a "down the road" possibility in my last paragraph - I just spelled it wrong :) > An enhancement of this idea would be to implement the "TopRAID" with a full-server mirror using drdb and heartbeat. . . No budget at the moment for a extra filer, nor for the hefty WAN needed.