linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Nabar <rpnabar@gmail.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] calculating free capacity from pvdisplay and lvdisplay
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:03:39 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimUB-xWqJEteT6mvpLQ2Y4y1qGdGYK1LTz-bh=F@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281507031.21952.1@raydesk1.bettercgi.com>

On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 1:10 AM, Ray Morris <support@bettercgi.com> wrote:

Thanks Giorgio and Ray! That helps!
>
> df shows that your LVs take up 8.6TB: 6TB + 600 GB + 2 TB.
> Therefore, you are using 8.6TB of disk space for those LVs.
> Some of the space WITHIN each LV might not be used for files,
> but it has been dedicated to that LV.

Makes sense! The only reason that I was confused was why 3 of my PV's
say "yes (but full)" and the other three not. How does one explain
that?

1.63x3=4.89 still less than 8.6.

Has the VG spanned across the first 3 PVs fully and then utilized the
remaining 3 partially?


> I'm not good at explaining things, so sometimes I try explaining three
> different ways. �I have six cereal boxes, each half empty. �I put the
> boxes in a bag. �The bag is now full. �The cereal boxes may not be full,
> but they fill up the bag. �The cereal boxes are your half empty LVs and
> the bag is your drives.

Food based analogies are always good! :)

Giorgio:

The vgs output is exactly as you say:

[root@eustorage ~]# vgs
  VG                      #PV #LV #SN Attr   VSize VFree
  euclid_highperf_storage   6   3   0 wz--n- 9.80T 1.22T

-- 
Rahul

  reply	other threads:[~2010-08-11 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-08-11  2:25 [linux-lvm] calculating free capacity from pvdisplay and lvdisplay Rahul Nabar
2010-08-11  6:10 ` Ray Morris
2010-08-11 17:03   ` Rahul Nabar [this message]
2010-08-11 17:19     ` Ray Morris
2010-08-11  8:42 ` Giorgio Bersano
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-08-11 22:26 Daksh Chauhan
2010-08-11 22:40 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2010-08-11 23:01   ` Rahul Nabar
2010-08-11 23:56     ` Malahal Naineni
2010-08-12  0:22       ` Rahul Nabar
2010-08-12  0:52         ` Malahal Naineni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='AANLkTimUB-xWqJEteT6mvpLQ2Y4y1qGdGYK1LTz-bh=F@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rpnabar@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).