From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx14.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.19]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r61ApINI023375 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:51:18 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com (mail-lb0-f181.google.com [209.85.217.181]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r61ApGcN022684 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 06:51:17 -0400 Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id w10so2330363lbi.12 for ; Mon, 01 Jul 2013 03:51:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 12:51:16 +0200 Message-ID: From: Alessandro MACUZ Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c242fe0087ce04e0710217 Subject: [linux-lvm] LVM handling the entire physical disk Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: LVM general discussion and development --001a11c242fe0087ce04e0710217 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What are the benefits/disadvantages between building VGs over 0x8e partitions or having LVM managing the entire disk with no partition table? We're not speaking about boot volumes since I assume I know how to handle that case. Alex --001a11c242fe0087ce04e0710217 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 What are the benefits/disadvantages between building VGs over 0x8e partitions or having LVM managing the entire disk with no partition table?

We're not speaking about boot volumes since I assume I know how to handle that case.

Alex
--001a11c242fe0087ce04e0710217--