From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx11.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.16]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8TAewAG028129 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:40:58 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com (mail-ww0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8TAeq3U001886 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 06:40:53 -0400 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so503880wwi.27 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 03:40:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4E5392A6.6000201@redhat.com> <4E5C993F.7050706@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:40:52 +0200 Message-ID: From: Zdenek Kabelac Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm_vg_create_lv_linear() stuck in dm_udev_wait() Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alexander Lyakas Cc: LVM general discussion and development 2011/9/23 Alexander Lyakas : > Hello Zdenek, > I just wanted to update you: > > - ubuntu confirmed that this rule is problematic, and causes also other issues: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/833891 > > - we have uninstalled the ubuntu lvm package, and using now the 88 > version that you pointed at. > > At this point, this are going pretty well, although sometimes we have > conflicts with other ubuntu packages, which try to install lvm/dmsetup > from ubuntu, so we are preventing them from doing that. > > We had to add a code to manually activate the LVs once the VG shows up > (it was done by the ubuntu rule), but this is perfectly fine for us. > > A question that we have: building the official LVM package has a lot > of configuration options. We have picked some that make sense, > especially the udev synchronization options. But perhaps we missed > some important ones. Do you think you can recommend a set of conf > options, to make the package most "friendly"? > It really depends on the type of use - i.e. you may check Fedora packaging configure options construction in its rpm.spec. Though some of them are now either defaults or not really usable. I think the key ones are: --enable-applib --enable-cmdlib --enable-dmeventd -enable-udev_sync and some cluster ones if you need them --with-clvmd=cman,openais,corosync --enable-cmirrord Zdenek