From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <51DBDDE8.3010206@redhat.com> <51DBFFC4.6070501@redhat.com> <51DC0E38.7060903@redhat.com> <51DC1BBF.9090405@redhat.com> <51DC2B98.5020406@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 20:39:49 +0500 Message-ID: From: Micky Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Very slow i/o after snapshotting Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Marian Csontos Cc: Zdenek Kabelac , LVM general discussion and development I meant alignment for all dm entries 0 through 31 is zero! >> What does the `lsblk -t` say? Could be an alignment issue. > > 0 through 31 > >> What's `free` saying about the free memory and cache? (dmeventd on 6.4 is >> trying to lock a large chunk of address space in RAM (~100M) > > Cached mem looks good. > Dmeventd. Right. It is. Isn't it spawed everytime an LV is created? > root 6813 0.0 1.4 197056 11044 ? S