From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm and Debian
In-Reply-To: Your message of
    "Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:44:18 +0100."
    <20020118104418.GA29876@balu.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>
References: <E16RWI7-00083Z-00@arwen.dev33.cvf>
    <20020118104418.GA29876@balu.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Pierrick PONS <ppons@cvf.fr>
Message-Id: <E16RWih-0000HQ-00@arwen.dev33.cvf>
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
Date: Fri Jan 18 04:59:01 2002
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

> > 
> > Am I obliged to use lvm_1.0.1-rc4 (that's the latest I found on Sistina web 
> > site ) if I'm under a 2.4.17 kernel ?
> 
> The text on http://www.sistina.com/products_lvm_download.htm is not up
> to date. There's 1.0.1 final already on the FTP server. Just follow the
> link to 1.0.1rc4.
> 
> Although I did not have any problems with the 1.0.1rc4(ish) code in
> stock kernel 2.4.17, I'd recommend using 1.0.1. 
> 
> Regards, Markus
> 
> -- 
> Free the Fluffy Bunny.
> 

There's a thing I don't understand : is the lvm_1.0.1rc4 patch still in the 
2.4.17 kernel or do I have to patch my 2.4.17 kernel to use lvm and lvm 
commands ?

I thought that using a 2.4.17 kernel permitted to have lvm fonctionalities and 
not to be obliged to patch the kernel.

Sorry for my ignorance.


Pierrick