From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:35:46 -0200 (BRDT)
From: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] with 2.4.1, should I use beta2 or beta3 lvm-tools?
In-Reply-To: <20010202155441.A1771@66bassett.freeserve.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102021433100.1328-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Errors-To: linux-lvm-admin@sistina.com
Reply-To: linux-lvm@sistina.com
List-Help: <mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-lvm@sistina.com>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.sistina.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm>,
	<mailto:linux-lvm-request@sistina.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.sistina.com/pipermail/linux-lvm/>
List-Id: <linux-lvm.redhat.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-lvm@sistina.com

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Joe Thornber wrote:

> 2.4.1 has beta2 in it, we have been maintaining this to produce
> beta3 and shortly beta4.  Alan and Linus have been sent these
> updates

Interesting, the only reference to LVM in Linus' changelog
is the following:

- Andrea Arkangeli: LVM update

And I seem to remember only a more limited patch by Andrea
which solved one or two problems. Did Andrea send your release
to Linus or did he send his own set of bugfixes ?

regards,

Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml

Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com/