Re: [linux-lvm] with 2.4.1, should I use beta2 or beta3 lvm-tools?

[Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>]

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Joe Thornber wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:35:46PM -0200, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Joe Thornber wrote:
> > 
> > > 2.4.1 has beta2 in it, we have been maintaining this to produce
> > > beta3 and shortly beta4.  Alan and Linus have been sent these
> > > updates
> > 
> > Interesting, the only reference to LVM in Linus' changelog
> > is the following:
> > 
> > - Andrea Arkangeli: LVM update
> 
> As well as providing valuable LVM patches Andrea has been
> forwarding our releases to Linus, he seems to have a 'fast path'
> to the kernel.

OK, cool. For the last few weeks I've been fooled into
thinking that the LVM folks would never send their stuff
to Linus and we'd all be relying on other people to get
the necessary bugfixes in the kernel.

I'm happy to be proven wrong...

regards,

Rik
--
Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml

Virtual memory is like a game you can't win;
However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...

		http://www.surriel.com/
http://www.conectiva.com/	http://distro.conectiva.com/