From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id k2F4Eb112624 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:14:37 -0500 Received: from tungsten.msp.technicality.org (tungsten.msp.technicality.org [216.250.164.46]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k2F4EZBi012005 for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:14:36 -0500 Received: from tungsten.msp.technicality.org (tungsten.msp.technicality.org [216.250.164.46]) by tungsten.msp.technicality.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k2F4ES3r018211 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:14:28 -0600 Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:14:27 -0600 (CST) From: Nate Carlson Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] I/O error In-Reply-To: <20060314191028.GA25405@percy.comedia.it> Message-ID: References: <4415681D.5080806@arnet.net.ar> <20060314191028.GA25405@percy.comedia.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: LVM general discussion and development On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Luca Berra wrote: > probably because multipath-tools is a cleaner solution? Hmm.. hadn't run into this one before; looked over the docs.. looks interesting, and very flexible, but also a heck of a lot more complicated. :) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | nate carlson | natecars@natecarlson.com | http://www.natecarlson.com | | depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------