From: Alexander Lazarevich <alazarev@itg.uiuc.edu>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: [linux-lvm] LVM on RAID
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 16:53:58 -0500 (CDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0609191650560.1397@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1158609477.19905.38.camel@bounty.rider.geekspirit.net>
We have several RAID devices (16-24 drive Fiber/SCSI attached RAID) which
are currently single devices on our 64bit linux servers (RHEL-4, core5).
We are considering LVM'ing 2 or more of the RAID's into a LVM group. I
don't doubt the reliability and robustness of LVM2 on single drives, but I
worry about it on top of RAID devices.
Does anyone have any experience with LVM on to of RAID volumes, positive
or negative?
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-19 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-18 18:10 [linux-lvm] HDD Failure Nick
2006-09-18 19:08 ` Mitch Miller
2006-09-18 19:13 ` Nick
2006-09-18 19:23 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-18 19:34 ` Nick
2006-09-18 19:37 ` Mark Krenz
2006-09-19 22:40 ` [linux-lvm] Misleading documentation (was: HDD Failure) Scott Lamb
2006-09-20 0:35 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-20 3:22 ` Mark Krenz
2006-09-20 11:27 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-20 19:45 ` [linux-lvm] Misleading documentation Barnaby Claydon
2006-09-20 10:50 ` Morten Torstensen
2006-09-20 11:40 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-09-20 12:41 ` Les Mikesell
2006-09-21 9:42 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
2006-09-21 12:52 ` Les Mikesell
2006-09-20 13:22 ` [linux-lvm] Misleading documentation (was: HDD Failure) Tobias Bluhm
2006-09-20 23:21 ` Scott Lamb
2006-09-18 19:42 ` [linux-lvm] HDD Failure Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-18 19:52 ` Nick
2006-09-18 19:57 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-19 21:53 ` Alexander Lazarevich [this message]
2006-09-19 22:03 ` [linux-lvm] LVM on RAID Roger Lucas
2006-09-24 17:19 ` Nix
2006-09-19 22:04 ` Mark Krenz
2006-09-19 22:11 ` Michael Loftis
2006-09-20 0:30 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-20 13:55 ` Matthew B. Brookover
2006-09-20 14:01 ` Michael T. Babcock
2006-09-20 14:48 ` Alexander Lazarevich
2006-09-20 15:57 ` Fabien Jakimowicz
2006-09-21 3:19 ` Andrew Boyko
2006-09-20 17:24 ` Mark H. Wood
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-09-20 14:59 Marlier, Ian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.63.0609191650560.1397@zeus.itg.uiuc.edu \
--to=alazarev@itg.uiuc.edu \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).