From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id kBC4rWqq032250 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:53:33 -0500 Received: from tungsten.msp.technicality.org (tungsten.msp.technicality.org [216.250.164.46]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kBC4rWeB011200 for ; Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:53:32 -0500 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 22:52:22 -0600 (CST) From: Nate Carlson Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM2 and OCFS2 In-Reply-To: <457D4295.9060601@mortent.org> Message-ID: References: <457D2F40.7060708@redhat.com> <457D4295.9060601@mortent.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: morten@mortent.org, LVM general discussion and development On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Morten Torstensen wrote: > Another option is GPFS from IBM, free as in beer. It really is a state > of the art cluster filesystem and well worth the effort to look into if > you are in the market for a cluster FS. GPFS is available for free now? I'm not finding it available for download anywhere - got a link? y ------------------------------------------------------------------------ | nate carlson | natecars@natecarlson.com | http://www.natecarlson.com | | depriving some poor village of its idiot since 1981 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------