From: "Stuart D. Gathman" <stuart@bmsi.com>
To: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Lvm Strange Problem
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:39:19 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1010111737090.32080@bmsred.bmsi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CB31DDC.5040206@johestephan.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1475 bytes --]
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, J�rg Stephan wrote:
> > I believe your problem is with your SAN, not LVM (you did mention using
> > iSCSI). I'm talking about SAN snapshots, not LVM snapshots (although the
> > SAN server could very well use LVM underneath). The SAN volumes have no
> > names, just LUNs. At boot, they are searched for a matching UUID, just
> > like directly attached physical volumes. When taking a SAN snapshot
> > (clone), the UUID of the clone is the same as the original, whether a
> > filesystem or VG is on the SAN LUN.
>
> Okay, but we dont use SAN snapshots, we use an lvcreate --snapshot on
> the client. So the storage just dont know about them.
>
> What happens is, we lv snapshot a volume, mount it copy the data to the
> new volume we create after snapshooting the source, remove the old
> snapshot and turning of the new machine. It rans about half an year,
> gets stoped, and after it turning on again the lvm data on the iscsi
> volume is last cahnged on the 23 februar 2010, even if the snapshot was
> made much earlier.
If the contents of (50% of) your SAN disks have reverted, then your issue
is with SAN (iSCSI is a SAN protocol), not with LVM.
--
Stuart D. Gathman <stuart@bmsi.com>
Business Management Systems Inc. Phone: 703 591-0911 Fax: 703 591-6154
"Confutatis maledictis, flammis acribus addictis" - background song for
a Microsoft sponsored "Where do you want to go from here?" commercial.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-11 21:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-11 7:53 [linux-lvm] Lvm Strange Problem Jörg Stephan
2010-10-11 12:40 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2010-10-11 12:59 ` Jörg Stephan
2010-10-11 13:23 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2010-10-11 14:23 ` Jörg Stephan
2010-10-11 21:39 ` Stuart D. Gathman [this message]
2010-10-11 13:12 ` Stuart D. Gathman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-10-11 17:41 beswars
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1010111737090.32080@bmsred.bmsi.com \
--to=stuart@bmsi.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).