From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B61BD374CE for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:16:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="HiGyZv7W" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1700252214; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VLA4AgF0D14taOEtynM9yEdNov4TbB7PJO1+J7fhGII=; b=HiGyZv7WJnOWlsttNbyDC/WtATT1TX0OHWjr7hZ0nRPCCBTa75d+JYndJ4nMFt5KQRdoRI liKpV1AGzXEa+81SYx9VRWJ+/U4nxfuwyIbyHXigv6XMQjy8H/qwruVLd9PFoJKEIL5zP+ UNpTbHdkN15oFkSGkfDzBMlRlaANR9Y= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-675-WyyHuxSxMpC09naLILy3og-1; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 15:16:51 -0500 X-MC-Unique: WyyHuxSxMpC09naLILy3og-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C301A811E7E; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.22.33.46]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A02E1C060AE; Fri, 17 Nov 2023 20:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2023 14:16:48 -0600 From: David Teigland To: Demi Marie Obenour Cc: Zdenek Kabelac , Heming Zhao , Peter Rajnoha , Martin Wilck , "bmarzins@redhat.com" , "linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev" , Glass Su , "hare@suse.de" Subject: Re: discuss about commit 3b0f9ce: filter-mpath: get wwids from sysfs vpd_pg83 Message-ID: References: <177c4b2f-3b4b-44e0-9391-3df007cafe36@redhat.com> <194d20b7-e3b0-43d6-95e1-1a7d56eab506@redhat.com> <037a0ba9-76fc-469c-ac96-11981391903b@suse.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.4.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 02:57:35PM -0500, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > > Yes, the devices file is intended to be a default feature of lvm since the > > commit above. > > Could LVM issue a deprecation warning if DEFAULT_USE_DEVICES_FILE is set > to 0 or system.devices is not set at runtime? No, deprecated implies we're planning to remove it, which we probably never will. Dave