From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
To: Phillip Susi <phill@thesusis.net>
Cc: linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:22:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZaeAJtE+0Gmp2b0E@mail.bitfolk.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZabjW4HWOSfy8sRN@mail.bitfolk.com>
Hi Phillip,
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 08:13:15PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 01:24:29PM -0500, Phillip Susi wrote:
> > No, it wouldn't be a problem without the partition table. ext4 uses its
> > own block size, which is pretty much always 4k. It doesn't know or care
> > about the underlying disk logical sector size.
>
> I've found quite a few people having similar problems to me so I'm
> not sure about this, but I haven't had chance to test it yet. I
> will try it out before I explore hdparm.
I've tested ext4 directly on the LV with no partition table now and
you're correct - no issues there! Apologies for doubting you - so
many different vague accounts of issues out there.
So, the actual problem here is something about the MBR partition
table. Off-topic now for this list but I wonder if there is a safe
and reliable way to modify such a partition table after sync to
allow this to work…
Thanks,
Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-17 7:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-15 7:30 Any way in LVM to deal with 512e vs 4Kn physical devices? Andy Smith
2024-01-15 21:07 ` Roger Heflin
2024-01-16 18:24 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-16 20:13 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-17 7:22 ` Andy Smith [this message]
2024-01-17 12:13 ` Roger Heflin
2024-01-17 14:10 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-20 4:45 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-20 18:00 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-20 20:56 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-24 16:18 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-24 21:17 ` Roger Heflin
2024-01-25 19:05 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-17 14:06 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-16 19:30 ` Ilia Zykov
2024-01-16 20:17 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-17 10:36 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2024-01-17 11:21 ` Andy Smith
2024-01-17 11:48 ` Zdenek Kabelac
2024-01-17 14:24 ` Phillip Susi
2024-01-17 19:05 ` Ilia Zykov
2024-01-26 1:21 ` Glenn Washburn
2024-01-26 1:35 ` Demi Marie Obenour
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZaeAJtE+0Gmp2b0E@mail.bitfolk.com \
--to=andy@strugglers.net \
--cc=linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phill@thesusis.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).