From: Lou Arnold <larnolda1@gmail.com>
To: Drew <drew.kay@gmail.com>
Cc: LVM general discussion and development <linux-lvm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] Total free space using added VGs and LVs
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:26:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a5a956f70910191726j7b7b0e7bx2738e5c6517cb537@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c268e4660910191251x485888edm470b67a1999d5241@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2508 bytes --]
Yes, OK, I see the advantage in your examples.
I've tried this (add a drive to VolGroup00/LogVol00) and it certainly works,
but it is much more difficult to undo than 1) creating a new volume group
and new volume, or 2) adding the drive to VolGroup00 and creating a new
volume. I read the documentation, but the file system fails whenever I
reboot. After all, LogVol00 is mounted at root, you can't unmount root
to shrink the volume. If you assume that the drive is empty and so you don't
have any data to migrate, how does one do it?
On 10/19/09, Drew <drew.kay@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > 1) Why would you want several logical volumes in one volume group?
> >>
> >> The same reason(s) you would want to partition a regular hard drive.
> >>
> >> Maybe you only want /home to have 20GB so your kids can't flood the
> >> computer with downloaded music. Maybe you want /var/www to have
> >> restricted permissions so your home web server is less vulnerable to
> >> hackers. Maybe you're running a PVR application like MythTV and want a
> >> high-performance filesystem like XFS for storing recorded shows.
> >>
> >> All of these can be done with logical volumes, and are often easier
> under
> >> LVM.
> >
> >
> > But then if the above is true, then you may as well simply mount the
> > partition as normal and add an entry into the fstab file. You get no
> > advantage one way or the other - is that true?
>
> LVM does this better then regular disk partitioning. The fact that it
> creates a pool of space is it's power.
>
> Two examples.
>
> Let's say you don't have LVM and partitioned your disk with some
> leftover space. What happens if you change your mind and want to
> increase the size of a partition? Now you have to juggle the
> partitions on the disk while you move that free space around to a
> place where the partition can be extended. I've done it before and
> it's messy. LVM? Just use the lvextend command with the right
> parameters and you're done.
>
> Next. Say you have two 80GB disks each partitioned with two partitions
> 60GB & 20GB. Now say you need to add an extra partition 30GB in size.
> How? With regular disks, you pretty much can't. With LVM, you'd have
> 40GB free and can just create the 30GB logical volume without worrying
> about which disk.
>
> As a side note, can you cc: the LVM list when you reply? I don't think
> they're getting your side of this conversation.
>
>
> --
> Drew
>
> "Nothing in life is to be feared. It is only to be understood."
> --Marie Curie
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3039 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-20 0:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-19 14:52 [linux-lvm] Total free space using added VGs and LVs Lou Arnold
2009-10-19 17:21 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2009-10-19 18:03 ` Drew
[not found] ` <a5a956f70910191114r3025ec45r5ddb2e02620fb0c0@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-19 18:41 ` Drew
[not found] ` <a5a956f70910191200t340c02c2t28f14d3aef46cfdc@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-19 19:51 ` Drew
2009-10-20 0:26 ` Lou Arnold [this message]
2009-10-20 3:19 ` Drew
[not found] ` <a5a956f70910201044j12e70c1cg78f454e580595815@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-21 15:02 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-21 15:28 ` Drew
2009-10-21 19:03 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-21 19:18 ` Ryan Anderson
2009-10-23 0:26 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-23 0:52 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2009-10-21 22:54 ` David
2009-10-23 6:52 ` Luca Berra
2009-10-23 19:06 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-23 20:12 ` Ryan Anderson
2009-10-23 20:41 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-24 0:06 ` Brian McCullough
2009-10-24 7:34 ` Luca Berra
2009-10-24 16:43 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-24 17:04 ` brem belguebli
2009-10-24 19:16 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-24 20:54 ` brem belguebli
2009-10-24 21:21 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-24 22:04 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2009-10-25 8:46 ` Luca Berra
2009-10-25 13:13 ` Drew
2009-10-25 18:09 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2009-10-25 19:17 ` Stuart D. Gathman
2009-10-26 15:20 ` Lou Arnold
2009-10-26 19:39 ` Stuart D. Gathman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a5a956f70910191726j7b7b0e7bx2738e5c6517cb537@mail.gmail.com \
--to=larnolda1@gmail.com \
--cc=drew.kay@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).