Linux LVM users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Anthony W. Marino" <anthony@AWMObjects.com>
To: Seth Mos <knuffie@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@NorcrossGroup.com>,
	Petro <petro@auctionwatch.com>,
	linux-lvm@sistina.com, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com,
	mysql@lists.mysql.com
Subject: Re: re[2]: [linux-lvm] System Suggestions
Date: Thu Mar  7 04:07:01 2002	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <auto-000021554843@front2.mail.megapathdsl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.10.10203070728480.16043-100000@xs3.xs4all.nl>

On Thursday 07 March 2002 01:32 am, Seth Mos wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Anthony W. Marino wrote:
> > > If you are looking into using the 3Ware controllers watch the
> > > following: The 64xx controllers are underpowered and should better not
> > > be used in raid 5 mode.
> > > The 74xx controllers seem to be good and should be fine with raid5 but
> > > note that raid5 will always have slow write speeds.
> >
> > Is there a way to minimize the write penalty using both XFS and LVM with
> > RAID 5?
>
> Don't use raid5. I always use a combination of raid 1 and 10 for a
> database server. If you have a database that frequently updates records
> you don't want the extra write overhead.
>
> Software raid 1 or 10 will do fine in that case.
> If you have 4 disks you make 2 raid 1 arrays and then stripe those in a
> raid 0. You then have optimum speed at the lowest possible overhead.
>
> Generally that is what you want for a database server.
>
> Cheers
> Seth

I caught a few emails on linux-lvm list where an external log is being used 
as well to better write performance.

Thanks Alot,
Anthony

  reply	other threads:[~2002-03-07  4:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-03-06 15:04 re[2]: [linux-lvm] System Suggestions Greg Freemyer
2002-03-06 15:11 ` Theo Van Dinter
2002-03-06 15:25   ` Anders Widman
2002-03-06 15:51     ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 15:46   ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 15:57     ` Theo Van Dinter
2002-03-06 16:02       ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 21:40   ` Petro
2002-03-06 21:52     ` Benjamin Scott
2002-03-06 22:47     ` Tim
2002-03-07  4:26       ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-07  4:05     ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 22:15   ` Stuart Levy
2002-03-07  4:24     ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-07  9:29     ` Stuart Levy
2002-03-06 15:23 ` re[2]: " Seth Mos
2002-03-06 15:39   ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-07  0:32     ` Seth Mos
2002-03-07  4:07       ` Anthony W. Marino [this message]
2002-03-07  8:57       ` Tim
2002-03-06 15:30 ` Steven Critchfield
2002-03-06 15:59   ` Kirby C. Bohling
2002-03-06 16:37     ` José Luis Domingo López
2002-03-06 16:41     ` José Luis Domingo López
2002-03-06 17:00   ` re[2]: " Tim
2002-03-06 15:43 ` Anthony W. Marino
2002-03-06 16:52 ` Tim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=auto-000021554843@front2.mail.megapathdsl.net \
    --to=anthony@awmobjects.com \
    --cc=freemyer@NorcrossGroup.com \
    --cc=knuffie@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=linux-lvm@sistina.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=mysql@lists.mysql.com \
    --cc=petro@auctionwatch.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox