From: Peter Rajnoha <prajnoha@redhat.com>
To: Martin Wilck <martin.wilck@suse.com>,
Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>,
Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>,
David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev,
Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/7] 10-dm-rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 11:49:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c19cc76a-96f9-4ffd-8208-0513f000d331@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240301224011.11117-4-mwilck@suse.com>
On 3/1/24 23:40, Martin Wilck wrote:
> We use DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG to tell upper non-DM layers
> to keep their hands off the device in question, for any reason.
> One possible reason is that the device is supended; another is that
> the cookie carries the flag of the same name.
>
> DM_SUSPENDED is not restored from the db, but evaluated anew for every
> uevent. Therefore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG shouldn't be
> restored, either. Use a new variable DM_COOKIE_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG
> to save and restore the original value from the cookie.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
> ---
> udev/10-dm.rules.in | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/udev/10-dm.rules.in b/udev/10-dm.rules.in
> index c08d829..ef36209 100644
> --- a/udev/10-dm.rules.in
> +++ b/udev/10-dm.rules.in
> @@ -48,7 +48,14 @@ ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="dm_end"
> # These flags are encoded in DM_COOKIE variable that was introduced in
> # kernel version 2.6.31. Therefore, we can use this feature with
> # kernels >= 2.6.31 only. Cookie is not decoded for remove event.
> -ENV{DM_COOKIE}=="?*", IMPORT{program}="(DM_EXEC)/dmsetup udevflags $env{DM_COOKIE}"
> +ENV{DM_COOKIE}!="?*", GOTO="dm_no_cookie"
> +IMPORT{program}="(DM_EXEC)/dmsetup udevflags $env{DM_COOKIE}"
> +
> +# Store the original flag from the cookie as DM_COOKIE_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG
> +# in the udev db. DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG will be or'd with other
> +# conditions for use by upper, non-dm layers.
> +ENV{DM_COOKIE_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}="%E{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}"
> +LABEL="dm_no_cookie"
>
> # There is no cookie set nor any flags encoded in events not originating
> # in libdevmapper so we need to detect this and try to behave correctly.
> @@ -58,12 +65,13 @@ ENV{DM_UDEV_PRIMARY_SOURCE_FLAG}=="1", ENV{DM_ACTIVATION}="1", GOTO="dm_flags_do
> IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_DISABLE_DM_RULES_FLAG"
> IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_DISABLE_SUBSYSTEM_RULES_FLAG"
> IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_DISABLE_DISK_RULES_FLAG"
> -IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG"
> +IMPORT{db}="DM_COOKIE_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG"
> IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_LOW_PRIORITY_FLAG"
> IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_DISABLE_LIBRARY_FALLBACK_FLAG"
> IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_PRIMARY_SOURCE_FLAG"
> IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_FLAG7"
> IMPORT{db}="DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN"
> +ENV{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}="%E{DM_COOKIE_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG}"
> LABEL="dm_flags_done"
>
> # Normally, we operate on "change" events. But when coldplugging, there's an
Looks good...
--
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-04 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-01 22:40 [RFC PATCH 0/7] device mapper udev rules rework Martin Wilck
2024-03-01 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] 13-dm-disk.rules: import ID_FS_TYPE Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 10:37 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-04 15:17 ` Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 15:44 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-01 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] 10-dm.rules: don't deactivate devices for DISK_RO=1 Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 10:48 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-04 11:19 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-04 11:27 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-04 15:21 ` Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 16:09 ` Martin Wilck
2024-03-05 8:09 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-01 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] 10-dm-rules: don't restore DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG from db Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 10:49 ` Peter Rajnoha [this message]
2024-03-01 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] 11-dm-lvm.rules: " Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 10:51 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-01 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_SUSPENDED Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 11:00 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-04 16:21 ` Martin Wilck
2024-03-05 8:19 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-05 8:47 ` Martin Wilck
2024-03-05 9:10 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-05 9:28 ` Martin Wilck
2024-03-01 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] dm udev rules: don't export and save DM_NOSCAN Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 11:03 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-01 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] 10-dm.rules: bump DM_UDEV_RULES_VSN to 3 Martin Wilck
2024-03-04 11:09 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-04 16:46 ` Martin Wilck
2024-03-05 8:26 ` Peter Rajnoha
2024-03-05 9:04 ` Martin Wilck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c19cc76a-96f9-4ffd-8208-0513f000d331@redhat.com \
--to=prajnoha@redhat.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.wilck@suse.com \
--cc=mwilck@suse.com \
--cc=teigland@redhat.com \
--cc=zkabelac@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).