From: christophe.ochal@gmail.com
To: Roger Heflin <rogerheflin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: lvm2 weirdness in Fedora 40
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:20:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3a94f90644d15fa41f176403051dacc8e5b58b3.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAMCDeef0QwdV3WX8X56K2TrxYuXkdV7Y=xPgj3w+geSUtnhVA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2025-02-22 at 10:55 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 10:05 AM <christophe.ochal@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 2025-02-16 at 15:45 -0600, Roger Heflin wrote:
> > > The first thing I would do is change the mount line to add
> > > ",nofail"
> > > on the options so that a failure does not drop you to single user
> > > mode.
> > >
> > > Then you can boot the system up and with the system on the
> > > network
> > > figure out the state of things.
> >
> > I wasn't aware of this option, but I'm not sure if this is any
> > better,
> > right now I can just run vgchange -ay end exit to resume the boot
> > process, to end up in the Gnome envronment, if add nofail to /home
> > i
> > stil end up in an unussable state because gnome can't load my
> > user's
> > files
> >
> > > In the old days I have seen lvm2-lvmetad break systems on boot up
> > > in
> > > bizarre ways.
> >
> > I'm not sure that fedora uses lvm2-lvmetad, and google isn't
> > helping
> > me, any hits i find are for red hat 9
> >
> > I wonder if this is relevant:
> >
> > From lvm.conf:
> >
> > # Configuration option devices/scan_lvs.
> > # Allow LVM LVs to be used as PVs. When enabled, LVM
> > commands
> > will
> > # scan active LVs to look for other PVs. Caution is
> > required to
> > # avoid using PVs that belong to guest images stored on
> > LVs.
> > # When enabled, the LVs scanned should be restricted using
> > the
> > # devices file or the filter. This option does not enable
> > autoactivation
> > # of layered VGs, which requires editing LVM udev rules
> > (see
> > LVM_PVSCAN_ON_LVS.)
> > # This configuration option has an automatic default value.
> > # scan_lvs = 1
> >
> > I had no luck on googling LVM_PVSCAN_ON_LVS
> >
> >
>
> That is only if you put a pv on top of a vg.
I do recall that I have 1 PV on one Volume Group (on top of 5 Spinning
Rust drives and one PV on top of 2 ssd's that used to function as a
cache that was setup in mirrorring
the cache has since been retired but I have no idea how to move the
data that is on the PV on that VG to get rid of that one last layer
I hope this is clear, I'm not at the workstation in question at the
moment
> Fedora may have finally got rid of lvmetad so it may not be the
> issue.
>
> What does cat /proc/cmdline look like?
>
> If /home is listed as mounting early but is not explicitly in cmdline
> (either a list of LV(rd.lvm.lv=) or VG(rd.lvm.vg) to turn on at boot)
> it will be missing. And if you configured it after initial install
> and/or changed the name of the LV then it won't get activated early
> and will fail early. I always use rd.lvm.vg to active everything in
> the boot vg at startup.
>
> you might try a "systemd-analyze blame" and see what it dumps for
> timers.
>
> The typical disk missing timeout is like 60-90 seconds were the boot
> should pause(and fail) before it gives you a emergency mode prompt.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-23 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-16 15:11 lvm2 weirdness in Fedora 40 christophe.ochal
2025-02-16 21:45 ` Roger Heflin
2025-02-22 16:05 ` christophe.ochal
2025-02-22 16:55 ` Roger Heflin
2025-02-23 9:20 ` christophe.ochal [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-02-16 15:05 christophe.ochal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3a94f90644d15fa41f176403051dacc8e5b58b3.camel@gmail.com \
--to=christophe.ochal@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rogerheflin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).