From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx2.redhat.com (mx2.redhat.com [10.255.15.25]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l0V8kBE1013835 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:46:12 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com (nf-out-0910.google.com [64.233.182.185]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l0V8kAbU008637 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:46:11 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k26so447109nfc for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:46:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 16:46:09 +0800 From: francism MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_7876_10042395.1170233169433" Subject: [linux-lvm] Space Allocation Scheme for snapshot Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com ------=_Part_7876_10042395.1170233169433 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, I had read some forum regarding snapshot performance. Some suggested to change the space allocation scheme of snapshot from STATIC to dynamic to increase performance. Anybody can tell which file on the source i can manipulated it? ------=_Part_7876_10042395.1170233169433 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi all,

I had read some forum regarding snapshot performance.
Some suggested to change the space allocation scheme of snapshot
from STATIC to dynamic to increase performance.

Anybody can tell which file on the source i can manipulated it?
------=_Part_7876_10042395.1170233169433--