From: Cory Zerwas <gannas@gmail.com>
To: linux-lvm@redhat.com
Subject: [linux-lvm] Missing 1 of 3 PVs and all partition tables are good
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 11:37:02 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ddaf98bd0511090937k1fd05f5ep20cc5a643955d916@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1826 bytes --]
Hi all,
I'm in a pinch. I've got about 500Gb of data trapped in a non-functioning
VG... Here's the deal:
I upgraded from FC3 to FC4, or tried to. The whole update bombed out but
during this time the LVM disks were unplugged from the system. When I got
the new system up on the old FS my LVM conf still appears to be in place. I
powered up the 3 drives and reset the system and I found the VG won't
activate.
I did not export the volume first. I realize now that this was a mistake.
I have 3 whole disks for this VG, each with 1 partition, type 8e, occupying
the entire disk. These are hdb1, hdc1, hdd1.
I'm noticing that an "fdisk -l" lists hdb, hdc, and hdd as all having
partitions of type 8e from beginning to end of disk. However, when I go into
LVM and run "pvscan" I only see two PVs belonging to my VG "bloaty" and it
shows:
PV /dev/hdc1 VG bloaty lvm2 [111.78 GB / 0 free]
PV /dev/hdd1 VG bloaty lvm2 [115.03 GB / 64.00 MB free]
Total: 2 [266.81 GB] / in use: 2 [226.81 GB] / in no VG: 0 [0 ]
LVM doesn't seem to notice /dev/hdb1? It's a 232.88 Gb PV, how can this be?
And why isn't PVSCAN complaining about a missing PV? It should be, shouldn't
it?
When I perform a "lvmdiskscan" I get (the parenthesis outline my input):
/dev/hda1 [ 101.94 MB]
(^^this is the /boot partition)
/dev/hdc1 [ 111.79 GB] LVM physical volume
/dev/hda2 [ 17.54 GB]
(^^this is the / partition)
/dev/hda3 [ 1.00 GB]
(^^this is the swap partition)
/dev/hdb1 [ 232.88 GB]
(^^THIS SHOULD BE A PV)
/dev/hdd1 [ 115.04 GB] LVM physical volume
Is there some trick here I don't know about? Do I have to restore the LVM
conf?
I am stumped. I'm pretty sure I'm not a newb, but I am definately not a
wizard. I've got my LPIC Level 1 cert if that means anything.
Heh, thanks for any help,
Cory
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2368 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2005-11-09 17:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-11-09 17:37 Cory Zerwas [this message]
2005-11-09 21:03 ` [linux-lvm] Missing 1 of 3 PVs and all partition tables are good Cory Zerwas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ddaf98bd0511090937k1fd05f5ep20cc5a643955d916@mail.gmail.com \
--to=gannas@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-lvm@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).