* [linux-lvm] lvm or raid 0?
@ 2009-07-24 12:21 vishesh kumar
2009-07-24 12:37 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: vishesh kumar @ 2009-07-24 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 96 bytes --]
Dear all
Is is true that LVM use RAID 0 ?
Does RAID 0 is more reliable than LVM ?
Thanks
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 131 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] lvm or raid 0?
2009-07-24 12:21 [linux-lvm] lvm or raid 0? vishesh kumar
@ 2009-07-24 12:37 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-07-25 8:24 ` vishesh kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk @ 2009-07-24 12:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
On 24. juli. 2009, at 14.21, vishesh kumar wrote:
> Dear all
>
> Is is true that LVM use RAID 0 ?
LVM /may/ use RAID 0 if you tell it to
> Does RAID 0 is more reliable than LVM ?
RAID 0 with md or LVM will give you approxmately the same performance
gain and the same level of reliability; it works like hell until a
drive dies, then it all dies. Don't use it unless you know what you're
doing.
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres
intelligibelt. Det er et element�rt imperativ for alle pedagoger �
unng� eksessiv anvendelse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de
fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate og relevante synonymer p� norsk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] lvm or raid 0?
2009-07-24 12:37 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
@ 2009-07-25 8:24 ` vishesh kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: vishesh kumar @ 2009-07-25 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LVM general discussion and development
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1165 bytes --]
Thanks for quick reply
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net>wrote:
> On 24. juli. 2009, at 14.21, vishesh kumar wrote:
>
> Dear all
>>
>> Is is true that LVM use RAID 0 ?
>>
>
> LVM /may/ use RAID 0 if you tell it to
>
> Does RAID 0 is more reliable than LVM ?
>>
>
>
> RAID 0 with md or LVM will give you approxmately the same performance gain
> and the same level of reliability; it works like hell until a drive dies,
> then it all dies. Don't use it unless you know what you're doing.
>
> roy
> --
> Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> (+47) 97542685
> roy@karlsbakk.net
> http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/
> --
> I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det
> er et elementært imperativ for alle pedagoger å unngå eksessiv anvendelse av
> idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvate
> og relevante synonymer på norsk.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> linux-lvm@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
> read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2118 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-25 8:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-24 12:21 [linux-lvm] lvm or raid 0? vishesh kumar
2009-07-24 12:37 ` Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
2009-07-25 8:24 ` vishesh kumar
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).