From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6OCLnCu007373 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:21:49 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f175.google.com (mail-pz0-f175.google.com [209.85.222.175]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6OCLZjp024379 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:21:35 -0400 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so698485pzk.23 for ; Fri, 24 Jul 2009 05:21:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:51:34 +0530 Message-ID: From: vishesh kumar Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=005045029ff82c22bb046f72a51e Subject: [linux-lvm] lvm or raid 0? Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com --005045029ff82c22bb046f72a51e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Dear all Is is true that LVM use RAID 0 ? Does RAID 0 is more reliable than LVM ? Thanks --005045029ff82c22bb046f72a51e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear all
=A0
=A0=A0=A0 Is is true that LVM use RAID 0 ?
=A0=A0 Does RAID 0 is more reliable than LVM ?

Thanks


--005045029ff82c22bb046f72a51e--