From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [172.16.48.31]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n6P8PLd3020520 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:25:21 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f175.google.com (mail-pz0-f175.google.com [209.85.222.175]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n6P8P0Ta009243 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 04:25:00 -0400 Received: by pzk5 with SMTP id 5so999251pzk.23 for ; Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:24:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 13:54:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvm or raid 0? From: vishesh kumar Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e91065ce2481046f837403 Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: LVM general discussion and development --001636e91065ce2481046f837403 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for quick reply On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk wr= ote: > On 24. juli. 2009, at 14.21, vishesh kumar wrote: > > Dear all >> >> Is is true that LVM use RAID 0 ? >> > > LVM /may/ use RAID 0 if you tell it to > > Does RAID 0 is more reliable than LVM ? >> > > > RAID 0 with md or LVM will give you approxmately the same performance gai= n > and the same level of reliability; it works like hell until a drive dies, > then it all dies. Don't use it unless you know what you're doing. > > roy > -- > Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk > (+47) 97542685 > roy@karlsbakk.net > http://blogg.karlsbakk.net/ > -- > I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. D= et > er et element=E6rt imperativ for alle pedagoger =E5 unng=E5 eksessiv anve= ndelse av > idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer adekvat= e > og relevante synonymer p=E5 norsk. > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/ > --001636e91065ce2481046f837403 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks for quick reply

On Fri, Jul 24, 20= 09 at 6:07 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk <roy@karlsbakk.net> wrote:
On 24. juli. 2009, at 14.21, vishesh kumar wrote:

Dear all

=A0 =A0Is is true that LVM use RAID 0 ?

LVM /may/ use RAID 0 if you tell it to


=A0 Does RAID 0 is more reliable than LVM ?


RAID 0 with md or LVM will give you approxmately the same performance gain = and the same level of reliability; it works like hell until a drive dies, t= hen it all dies. Don't use it unless you know what you're doing.
roy
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
(+47) 97542685
roy@karlsbakk.net
http://blogg.karl= sbakk.net/
--
I all pedagogikk er det essensielt at pensum presenteres intelligibelt. Det= er et element=E6rt imperativ for alle pedagoger =E5 unng=E5 eksessiv anven= delse av idiomer med fremmed opprinnelse. I de fleste tilfeller eksisterer = adekvate og relevante synonymer p=E5 norsk.


_______________________________________________
linux-lvm mailing list
linux-lvm@redhat.= com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm
read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/

--001636e91065ce2481046f837403--