From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx3.redhat.com (mx3.redhat.com [172.16.48.32]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id jAU71RV20154 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:01:27 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx3.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jAU71L5a016012 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 02:01:21 -0500 Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so46631wra for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:01:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:01:20 +0100 From: Wallace Wadge MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_2717_8640034.1133334080900" Subject: [linux-lvm] lvm + raid (confused) Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: To: linux-lvm@redhat.com ------=_Part_2717_8640034.1133334080900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I've got a hardware raid in place. I'd like to add snapshots via lvm to it but unfortunately the underlying filesystem is ext3 which cannot be resized downwards; therefore I would like to add another disk. Now for the problem: I would like to add a secondary (physical) disk to the mix and use it for snapshots only. However I do not want the lvm to stay writing to that disk for normal data since this seconday disk would not be part of my hardware raid. In other words, I wouldn't care if the snapshot drive failed because = I would just replace it. Is this at all possible? Thanks. Wallace ------=_Part_2717_8640034.1133334080900 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi,

I've got a hardware raid in place. I'd like to add snapshots via lvm to it but unfortunately the underlying filesystem is ext3 which cannot be resized downwards; therefore I would like to add another disk.

Now for the problem:

I would like to add a secondary (physical) disk to the mix and use it for snapshots only. However I do not want the lvm to stay writing to that disk for normal data since this seconday disk would not be part of my hardware raid. In oth= er words, I wouldn't care if the snapshot drive failed because I would just= replace it.

Is this at all possible?

Thanks.
Wallace
------=_Part_2717_8640034.1133334080900--