From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (ext-mx10.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.110.14]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB1ENXtd020474 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:23:33 -0500 Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB1ENOY7005439 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2010 09:23:25 -0500 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNnad-0003qQ-RD for linux-lvm@redhat.com; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:23:23 +0100 Received: from lan-fw.biochem.mpg.de ([141.61.181.2]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:23:23 +0100 Received: from johannes_graumann by lan-fw.biochem.mpg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:23:23 +0100 From: Johannes Graumann Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:23:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20101201141259.GA17090@barkeeper1-xen.linbit> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] [SOLVED]: lvm2 and partition shringkin: superblock/filesystem size mismatch Reply-To: LVM general discussion and development List-Id: LVM general discussion and development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: linux-lvm@redhat.com There ware complaints about unmatching group sizes, so I guess I lost data. Joh Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:45:42PM +0100, Johannes Graumann wrote: >> And yes, by that I set the truncation of the FS (thanks, Lars for >> pointing that out) in stone ... > > Soo... did the fsck you ran immediately after the mke2fs -S complain, > or did you get away with no more than a fright? > > Lars > > _______________________________________________ > linux-lvm mailing list > linux-lvm@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/linux-lvm > read the LVM HOW-TO at http://tldp.org/HOWTO/LVM-HOWTO/